Lenner
Haley Lenner v. Outdoorsy, Inc.; and Does 1 through 20
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HALEY LENNER, Case No.: 25-CV-828 TWR (DEB)
12 Plaintiff,
ORDER (1) VACATING HEARING,
13 v. (2) DENYING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE,
14 OUTDOORSY, INC.; and DOES 1
AND (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
through 20, 15 REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS Defendants. 16 (ECF No. 20) 17
18 Presently before the Court is Defendant Outdoorsy, Inc.’s Motion to Transfer Venue 19 (“Mot.,” ECF No. 20) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), as well as Plaintiff Haley Lenner’s 20 Response in Opposition to (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 23), and Defendant’s Reply in Support of 21 (“Reply,” ECF No. 26) the Motion. Plaintiff also requests sanctions under Federal Rules 22 of Civil Procedure 16(f)(1)(C) and 16(f)(2) based on Defendant’s failure to meet and confer 23 prior to filing the Motion as required by the undersigned’s Standing Order for Civil Cases. 24 (See Opp’n at 5, 9–11.) Because the Court concludes that the Motion is appropriate for 25 resolution on…