Laatz

Nicky Laatz, et al. v. Zazzle, Inc., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20255:22-cv-04844California1,744 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 NICKY LAATZ, et al., Case No. 5:22-cv-04844-BLF

8 Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

9 v. PETITION FOR § 1292(B)

CERTIFICATION FOR

10 ZAZZLE, INC., et al., INTERLOCUTORY REVIEW 11 Defendants. [Re: ECF No. 461]

12 13 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ petition for certification for interlocutory review of the 14 Court’s Order Granting Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s Order on 15 Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment Re Claim 4, Copyright Infringement (ECF No. 443 16 (“Order”)). ECF No. 461 (“Pet.”). Defendants do not oppose the Petition but request that the 17 Court stay proceedings in the case if the Court grants the petition. ECF No. 466 (“Response”). 18 Having considered the briefing and the governing law, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have 19 not made a sufficient showing to warrant certification for interlocutory review of the Order. The 20 Petition is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.