Casenas

Erlindo Casenas v. Milpitas Police Department, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20255:24-cv-08565California2,021 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ERLINDO CASENAS, Case No. 24-cv-08565-PCP

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS

10 MILPITAS POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 20 Defendants. 11

12 13 Pro se plaintiff Erlindo Casenas brings this lawsuit against nine defendants: the City of 14 Milpitas, the Milpitas Police Department, the Milpitas Police Officers Association, 24 Hour 15 Fitness, Sgt. Matison Mednick, Officer Vivian Ngyuen, Officer Maung Thiha Zaw, Officer 16 Melissa Pizzo Medieros, Officer Max Fontes, and Does 1 through 10. The City of Milpitas, the 17 Milpitas Police Department, Sgt. Matison Mednick, Officer Vivian Ngyuen, Officer Maung Thiha 18 Zaw, Officer Melissa Pizzo Medieros, and Officer Max Fontes (collectively, “City Defendants”) 19 now move to dismiss the claims against them. For the following reasons, the Court grants the City 20 Defendants’ motion. 21 BACKGROUND 22 Mr. Casenas filed this lawsuit in November 2024, then filed an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.