LaRose

Marco Ruiz Mancilla Ruiz v. Christopher J. Larose, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20253:25-cv-02714California335 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARCO RUIZ MANCILLA RUIZ, Case No. 25-cv-02714-BAS-SBC

12 Petitioner,

ORDER REQUIRING THE

13 v. GOVERNMENT TO RESPOND TO

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

14 CHRISTOPHER J. LAROSE, et al., CORPUS (ECF No. 1) 15 Respondents. 16 17 18 On October 14, 2025, Petitioner Marco Ruiz Mancilla Ruiz filed a Petition for Writ 19 of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (ECF No. 1.) In his Petition, Petitioner 20 claims that he is being detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement in violation of 21 the Fifth Amendment, as well as the Immigration and Nationality Act and its governing 22 regulations. (Id.) 23 Having reviewed the Petition, the Court finds summary dismissal is unwarranted at 24 this time. See Kourteva v. INS, 151 F. Supp. 2d 1126, 1128 (N.D. Cal. 2001) (“Summary 25 dismissal is appropriate only where the allegations in the petition are vague or conclusory, 26 palpably incredible, or patently frivolous or false.”). Therefore, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.