Shirley

Zachary Will Brenner v. Heather Shirley, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20251:24-cv-00545California435 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ZACHARY WILL BRENNER, Case No.: 1:24-cv-000545-KES-SKO 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO MODIFY THE DISCOVERY

13 v. AND SCHEDULING ORDER 14 HEATHER SHIRLEY, et al., (Doc. 28) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Zachary Will Brenner is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 18 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment 19 conditions of confinement claims against Defendants Shirley, Cronjager, and DeGough. 20 On June 25, 2025, the Court issued its Discovery and Scheduling Order, (Doc. 24), and 21 the deadline for filing an exhaustion-based summary judgment motion was set for September 25, 22 2025 (Id). 23 On September 9, 2025, Defendants filed Ex Parte Application to Modify the Discovery 24 and Scheduling Order, seeking to extend the deadline for filing an exhaustion-based summary 25 judgment motion to November 24, 2025. (Doc. 28.) 26 II. DISCUSSION 27 “The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.