Crawford

Dustin Lamont Crawford v. Fresno County Jail, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20251:25-cv-00869California570 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 DUSTIN LAMONT CRAWFORD, ) Case No.: 1:25-cv-0869 JLT SAB ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE FINDINGS ) AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE 13 v. ) ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND ) DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE 14 FRESNO COUNTY JAIL, et al., ) THIS CASE ) 15 Defendants. ) (Doc. 8) ) 16

17 Dustin Lamont Crawford filed a civil rights complaint, suggesting that he suffered violations of 18 his civil rights while in custody at Fresno County Jail. (See Doc. 7.) The Court screened Plaintiff’s 19 second amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) and observed that Plaintiff failed “to 20 complete the portion of the form complaint that requests Plaintiff to state what civil right has been 21 violated.” (Doc. 8 at 5.) The magistrate judge found, “Given the SAC fails to articulate even a short 22 and plain statement of the claim against the unspecified number of Doe ‘CO/Sheriffs’ Defendants, the 23 Court cannot independently discern any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.