M.F.
M.F., et al. v. Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified School District
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 M.F., et al., Case No. 2:24-cv-1009-JDP 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER 14 SIERRA-PLUMAS JOINT UNIFIED
SCHOOL DISTRICT,
15 Defendants. 16 17 Pending before the court are (1) defendants Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified School District 18 (“the District”) and Megan Meschery’s (collectively “District defendants”) motions for partial 19 dismissal and to strike, and (2) defendant Emma Shaffer’s counsel’s motion to withdraw. 20 Plaintiff M.F., and M.F.’s parents, John and Vanessa Doe, oppose the District defendants’ 21 motions, but not Shaffer’s. For the following reasons, the District defendants’ motion to dismiss 22 is granted; their motion to strike is granted in part and denied in part; and Shaffer’s motion is 23 granted. 24 Motion to Dismiss 25 I. Procedural History 26 Plaintiffs filed this action April 1, 2024, alleging claims for: (1) violation of substantive 27 due process, 42 U.S.C. § 1983; (2) Monell claims, 42 U.S.C. § 1983; (3) Title IX,…