Warren

Warren v. City of Henderson

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 21, 202524-4482California357 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 21 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALLANNA WARREN, No. 24-4482 D.C. No. 2:23-cv-01503-GMN-NJK Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CITY OF HENDERSON; HENDERSON

POLICE DEPARTMENT; HOLLIE

CHADWICK; DOE COLEMANM;

CLARK COUNTY NEVADA; MICHELLE

ROMERO; TIM BUCHANAN; GINA

WATERS; STEPHANIE NICKSON; LISA

KELSO,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 15, 2025**

Before: FRIEDLAND, MILLER, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Allanna Warren appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing her

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various claims. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Pickern v. Pier 1 Imports…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.