Hougas

Hougas v. Bisignano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 21, 202524-5650California913 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 21 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KENNETH PAUL HOUGAS, No. 24-5650 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:23-cv-08572-JAT v. MEMORANDUM*

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 17, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: COLLINS, MENDOZA, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Kenneth Paul Hougas appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the

Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of his application for disability benefits

and supplemental income. We review the district court’s decision de novo and “set

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). aside a denial of benefits only if it is not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.