Dema

Dema v. Halikowski

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 21, 202523-3136California471 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 21 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VICTOR DEMA, No. 23-3136 D.C. No. 2:23-cv-00303-SMB Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

JOHN S. HALIKOWSKI, (Director of) the Arizona Department of Transportation,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan M. Brnovich, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 15, 2025**

Before: FRIEDLAND, MILLER, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Victor Dema appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his

motion to remand. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

novo. Ritchey v. Upjohn Drug Co., 139 F.3d 1313, 1315 (9th Cir. 1998). We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). affirm.

The district court properly denied Dema’s motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.