People v. Jackson CA1/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 21, 2025A170645California5,057 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/21/25 P. v. Jackson CA1/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A170645

v. CLINTON JACKSON, (San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. 24-SF-000967-A) Defendant and Appellant.

A jury convicted Clinton Jackson of four counts of making criminal threats aboard an Amtrak bus. (Pen. Code, § 422.)1 On appeal, Jackson contends (1) there was insufficient evidence to support two of the criminal threats convictions; and (2) the trial court prejudicially erred by instructing the jury on the corpus delicti rule. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Evidence at Trial Bus Driver N.V. (Count 1) N.V. regularly drove the Amtrak bus route from Oakland to Santa Barbara. On December 29, 2023,2 N.V. was driving…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.