CHARLESETTA MOORE, SR. v. C.F.Y. DEVELOPMENT INC., et al.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLESETTA MOORE. SR., No. 2:25-cv-0034-DAD-CKD (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

14 C.F.Y. DEVELOPMENT INC., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Charlesetta Moore proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis1 and seeks relief under 18 the Fair Housing Act. This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 19 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (“SAC”) is before 20 the court for screening. The SAC fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and the 21 undersigned recommends dismissal of the SAC without further leave to amend. 22 I. Screening Requirement 23 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the court must screen every in forma pauperis 24 proceeding, and must order dismissal of the case if it is “frivolous or malicious,” “fails to state a 25 claim on which relief may be granted,” or “seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is 26

27 1 Because the court has already granted…