McKie

Cody Lee McKie v. Salinas Valley State Prison, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20253:25-cv-04693California1,141 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CODY LEE MCKIE, Case No. 25-cv-04693-WHO (PR)

Plaintiff, 8

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

v. 9 WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

10 SALINAS VALLEY STATE PRISON, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 13 INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiff Cody Lee McKie alleges that prison guards were deliberately indifferent to 15 his safety when they forced him to cell with a particular prisoner, who later attacked him. 16 His 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint containing these allegations is now before me for review 17 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). 18 The complaint fails to state a claim for relief. McKie’s allegations do not contain 19 any specific facts showing that the prison guards not only were aware of facts from which 20 the inference could be drawn that the prisoner posed a substantial risk of serious harm to 21 him, but also that they drew that inference. Accordingly, the complaint is DISMISSED 22 with leave to file an amended complaint on or before December 8, 2025. Failure to file a 23 proper…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.