West
James West v. Sunnyvale/Santa Clara El Pollo Loco, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JAMES WEST, Case No. 24-cv-01840-HSG
8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 54 10 SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO LOCO, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Pending before the Court is the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants 14 Sunnyvale/Santa Clara El Pollo Loco. Dkt. No. 54. The Court finds this matter appropriate for 15 disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For 16 the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motion. 17 I. BACKGROUND 18 Pro se Plaintiff James West initially filed this case against Defendants in March 2024.1 19 See Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”). In the complaint, Plaintiff contends that he was refused service at two 20 different El Pollo Loco restaurant locations because of his race. See id. Plaintiff alleges that he is 21 African American and gender non-conforming, and participates in the “California Restaurant 22 Meals Program” (“RMP”), commonly referred to…