Powelson
Robbie Powelson v. Curtis Havel, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ROBBIE POWELSON, Case No. 24-cv-08245-JST
8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 9 v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
10 CURTIS HAVEL, et al., Re: ECF No. 81 Defendants. 11
12 13 Now before the Court is Plaintiff Robbie Powelson’s motion for leave to file a motion for 14 reconsideration regarding certain claims that the Court dismissed in its September 18, 2025 order. 15 ECF No. 81, 81-1. Powelson argues that the Court’s ruling that his state law claims were time- 16 barred failed to consider California Government Code § 945.3, which provides that state law 17 damages claims against peace officers, and entities employing peace officers, are tolled until the 18 termination of the underlying criminal proceedings. ECF No. 81-1 at 1. Powelson argues that the 19 Court’s omission constituted a manifest failure to consider a dispositive legal argument. ECF No. 20 81 at 1. 21 The Court will deny Powelson’s motion. A party seeking reconsideration…