Moreno
Jammir Moreno v. Nissan North America, Inc. and Does 1–20
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMMIR MORENO, Case No.: 3:25-cv-1706-CAB-JLB
12 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
13 v. REMAND
14 NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., and [Doc. No. 2]
DOES 1–20,
15 Defendants. 16
17
18 19 20 On May 8, 2025, Plaintiff Jammir Moreno (“Plaintiff”) sued Defendant Nissan 21 North America, Inc. (“Defendant”) under the Song-Beverly Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1790- 22 1795.8. [Doc. No. 1-2 at 3–10 (“Compl.”).] On July 3, 2025, Defendant filed a notice of 23 removal. [Doc. No. 1 (“NOR”).] On August 13, 2025, Plaintiff responded with the instant 24 motion to remand. [Doc. No. 2.] Pursuant to CivLR 7.1(d)(1), the Court finds the motion 25 suitable for submission on the papers without oral argument. For the reasons below, the 26 Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to remand. 27 /// 28 /// 1 I. BACKGROUND 2 Plaintiff purchased a used 2023 Nissan Rogue (“Vehicle”) from Defendant on 3 July 6, 2024, for $48,452.50. [Compl. ¶ 5; NOR at 3.] On at least…