RMS NA, INC. v. RMS (AUS) PTY LTD; RMS GLOBAL PTY LTD; P & J BUTTIGIEG NOMINEES PTY LTD; PETER ANTHONY BUTTIGIEG; JENNIFER LYNN

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RMS NA, INC., Case No.: 24-cv-01366-AJB-MMP Plaintiff, 12 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTIONS TO DISMISS 13

RMS (AUS) PTY LTD, an Australian 14 (Doc. Nos. 70, 71) limited proprietary company; RMS

15 GLOBAL PTY LTD, an Australian limited proprietary company; P & J 16 BUTTIGIEG NOMINEES PTY LTD, an 17 Australian limited proprietary company; PETER ANTHONY BUTTIGIEG, an 18 individual; JENNIFER LYNN 19 BUTTIGIEG, an individual; ASCOTT 2 PTE LTD, an Australian limited 20 proprietary company; ADVENT 21 PARTNERS 3 FUND LP, an Australian limited proprietary company; and DOES 22 1–100 23 Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 1 Before the Court are two motions to dismiss. (Doc. Nos. 70; 71.) First, a motion to 2 dismiss brought by Defendant RMS (Aust) Pty Ltd (“RMS Australia”). (Doc. No. 71.) 3 Second, a motion to dismiss brought by Defendants RMS Global Pty Ltd (“RMS Global”), 4 P & J Buttigieg Nominees Pty…