Prince Paul Raymond Williams v. Professional Courier and Newspaper Distribution, d/b/a Brandt Brothers, et. al.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PRINCE PAUL RAYMOND WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:25-cv-00973-KES-HBK 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

13 v. TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER1 14 PROFESSIONAL COURIER AND (Doc. No. 3) NEWSPAPER DISTRIBUTION, d/b/a 15 Brandt Brothers, et. al. FOURTEEN DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 16 Defendants. 17 18 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order. (Doc. 19 No. 3, “Motion”). Plaintiff filed his complaint (Doc. No. 1) on August 6, 2026, and filed the 20 Motion six days later on August 12, 2024. (Doc. No. 3). For the reasons stated below, the 21 undersigned recommends that Plaintiff’s Motion be denied. 22 I. Plaintiff’s Motion 23 Plaintiff Prince Paul Raymond Williams brings this Motion against Defendants 24 Professional Courier and Newspaper Distribution d/b/a Brandt Brothers, Inc. (“Brandt”) and Scott 25 Wilcox (“Wilcox”) (together, “Defendants”). (Doc. No. 3 at 1). …