UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL

Case No. 2:22-cv-03753-SPG-SHK Date October 22, 2025 Title Isidro J. Armenta v. City of Los Angeles et al.

a Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

P. Gomez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present

Proceeding: (INCHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO DISMISSAL FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Plaintiff Isidro Armenta filed this action in June 2022, alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law causes of action. See generally (ECF No. 1). In October 2023, the Court set a June 2024 trial date. See (ECF No. 37). However, Plaintiff failed to file any required trial filings. On June 26, 2024, the Court held a status conference to discuss the case schedule with the parties. See (ECF No. 74). After hearing from the parties, the Court referred the case to ADR and directed the parties to meet and confer about a new trial date. See (id. at 16, 24- 25). The parties were unable to resolve their dispute through ADR, see (ECF No. 76), and have yet to propose new trial dates. Neither party has filed any documents in this action since March 2025. See (ECF Nos. 78, 79). Therefore, the Court, on its own motion, issues to Plaintiff this Order to Show Cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. See Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962). Failure to respond in writing within ten (10) calendar days from the date of this Order will be deemed consent to the dismissal of this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Initials of Preparer pg