Luis Antonio Duran Sanchez v. Active Field Office Director, Adelanto Field Office, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20251:25-cv-00608California522 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 LUIS ANTONIO DURAN SANCHEZ, Case No. 1:25-cv-00608-EPG-HC

12 Petitioner, ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO

INFORM COURT REGARDING

13 v. PETITIONER’S CURRENT CUSTODY

STATUS

14 ACTIVE FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR, ADELANTO FIELD OFFICE, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 17 18 Petitioner is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 19 U.S.C. § 2241 that challenges his prolonged immigration detention absent a bond hearing. (ECF 20 No. 1.) 21 In Respondents’ motion to dismiss and response to the petition, filed on July 24, 2025, 22 Respondents noted that Petitioner’s next scheduled hearing before an immigration judge was set 23 for August 7, 2025, citing to the Executive Office of Immigration Review’s (“EOIR”) 24 Automated Case Information Tool. (ECF No. 10 at 5 & n.3.1) Based on the EOIR’s Automated 25 Case Information Tool, the immigration judge ordered Petitioner removed on August 7, 2025, 26 and no appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals was received. See EOIR Automated Case 27 Information…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.