1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GREGORY LAWSON LIGGINS JR., Case No.: 25-cv-2175-RSH-MMP

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

13 v.

14 FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 On August 22, 2025, plaintiff Gregory Lawson Liggins Jr., proceeding pro se, 19 commenced this action and filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF Nos. 20 1 (“Compl.”); 2. On the same day, Plaintiff further filed a motion for a preliminary 21 injunction. ECF No. 3. On September 9, 2025, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint. ECF 22 No. 4. On September 29, 2025, Plaintiff filed a notice withdrawing his Amended Complaint 23 and requesting that the Court “take no further action on this filing.” ECF No. 6 at 1. 24 The Court construes Plaintiff’s September 29, 2025 filing as a Notice of Voluntary 25 Dismissal of this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). A voluntary 26 dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) is self-executing and requires no further action 27 by the Court. United States v. 475 Martin Lane, 545 F.3d 1134, 1145–46 (9th Cir. 2008). 28 1 light of Plaintiff's Notice, it is therefore confirmed the instant action has been 2 || DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. ' The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 || Dated: September 28, 2025 ‘

6 Hon. Robert S. Huie United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Alternatively, to the extent Plaintiff did not intend his September 29, 2025 filing to 27 || be a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, the Court dismisses this action for Plaintiffs failure 28 Pay ne required filing fee as set forth in the Court’s September 26, 2025 Order. ECF