1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 OMAR CABRERA, No. 1:22-cv-00025 JLT GSA (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING NUNC PRO TUNC

PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR SCREENING

13 v. (ECF No. 24) 14 CA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES, et al., ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 15 FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE Defendants. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 (ECF No. 26) 17

PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED

18 COMPLAINT DUE IN SIXTY DAYS 19 20 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 21 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants have removed the case to this Court. See ECF No. 1. The 22 matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and 23 Local Rule 302. 24 Before this Court are Plaintiff’s request for screening and a motion for a sixty-day 25 extension of time to file a second amended complaint (“SAC”). See ECF Nos. 24, 26 26 (respectively). For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff’s request for screening will be granted nunc 27 pro tunc. In addition, Plaintiff’s motion for a sixty-day extension of time to file a SAC will be 28 1 granted. Finally, Plaintiff will also be ordered to file his SAC on the Court’s form and to limit the 2 pleading to twenty-five pages, not including exhibits. 3 I. REQUEST FOR SCREENING 4 On August 24, 2025, Plaintiff signed a document which requested that the Court screen 5 his lodged first amended complaint (“FAC”). See ECF No. 24 at 2. Thereafter, his request was 6 docketed on August 27, 2025. See id. (8/27/25 docketing date). 7 On August 28, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff’s FAC.1 ECF No. 25. Therefore, 8 Plaintiff’s request for screening will be granted nunc pro tunc. 9 II. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 10 A. Plaintiff’s Motion 11 When the Court screened Plaintiff’s FAC, it ordered him to file an amended complaint 12 and to do so in twenty-one days. ECF No. 25 at 11. On September 12, 2025, Plaintiff’s request 13 for an extension of time to file and amended complaint was docketed. ECF No. 26. Plaintiff asks 14 for sixty-days – or until November 17, 2025 – to file the amended complaint. Id. at 2. 15 In support of the motion, Plaintiff states that he has never asked for an extension; that he 16 lacks education and legal training; and, that he has difficulty obtaining facts while incarcerated. 17 ECF No. 26. He also states that because of prison law library restrictions and lockdowns he has 18 had a hard time obtaining materials and copies from it. Id. at 2. 19 B. Discussion 20 Good cause appearing, Plaintiff’s request for a sixty-day extension of time to file his SAC 21 will be granted, and instead of the SAC being due on November 17, 2025, the Court will permit 22 Plaintiff to file the SAC within sixty days from the date of this order. In so doing, however, the 23 Court will modify its screening order of Plaintiff’s FAC to now expressly limit the number 24 of pages Plaintiff ‘s SAC may contain to twenty-five pages, not including exhibits. 25 Plaintiff is also advised that repeated violations of Rule 8(a)'s "short and plain statement" 26 1 In so doing, the Court found that the FAC – which consisted of fifty-eight pages of narrative 27 and eighty-five pages of exhibits – violated Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) and (d)(1) which require a complaint to contain “short and plain” statements and “simple, concise, and 28 direct” allegations. See ECF No. 25 at 11. 1 requirement are strikes as "fail[ures] to state claim" when the opportunity to correct the pleading 2 has been afforded and there has been no modification within a reasonable [*5] time). See, Knapp 3 v. Hogan, 738 F.3d 1106, 1108-09 (9th Cir. 2013); Calderon v. Covello, No. 2:23-cv-2049 WBS 4 CSK P, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111802, at *4 (E.D. Cal. June 24, 2024). 5 The Court will again order Plaintiff to file his SAC on the Court’s Civil Rights Complaint 6 By a Prisoner form and to answer all the questions in it. Plaintiff is informed that his failure to 7 fully comply with the directions in this order will likely result in a recommendation that this 8 matter be dismissed in its entirety. 9 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 10 1. The Clerk of Court shall send Plaintiff a copy of the Court’s Civil Rights Complaint 11 By a Prisoner form; 12 2. Plaintiff’s request for screening (ECF No. 24) is GRANTED nunc pro tunc; 13 3. Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to file a second amended complaint (ECF 14 No. 26) is GRANTED; 15 4. Within sixty days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall file a second amended 16 complaint, and 17 5. Plaintiff’s second amended complaint shall: 18 a. Be FILED on the Court’s Civil Rights Complaint By a Prisoner form, and 19 b. Be NO MORE THAN twenty-five pages in length, not including exhibits. 20 Plaintiff is cautioned that his failure to comply with all the directives in this order 21 will likely result in a recommendation that this matter be dismissed. 22 23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24

25 Dated: September 20, 2025 /s/ Gary S. Austin

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26

27

28