Cabrera

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 JANET CABRERA, Case No. 1:25-cv-00737-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING SECOND MOTION

FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER, IN PART

NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., (ECF No. 14) Defendant.

14 15 This matter is before the Court on the parties’ second stipulated motion for a protective 16 order. (ECF No. 14). The Court denied the parties’ first motion without prejudice on September 17 18, 2025, because they failed to comply with the Court’s Rules and established practices. Upon 18 review, the Court will grant the parties’ second motion for a protective order, in part. 19 The parties define confidential information or items to mean “information (regardless of 20 how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection 21 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good 22 Cause Statement.” (ECF No. 14, p. 4). In turn, their good cause statement provides as follows: The plaintiff in this action seeks information,…