Martin

Felice Lazae Martin, et al. v. Michael Castillo, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20251:25-cv-01123California3,582 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 FELICE LAZAE MARTIN, et al., 1:25-cv-01123-KES-CDB

Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DENY MOTIONS FOR TEMPORARY

v. RESTRAINING ORDER, PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION, AND SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MICHAEL CASTILLO, et al., (Docs. 3, 4, 12, 17) Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE

15 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Felice Lazae Martin and Hector Joseph Borges initiated this action with the filing of a complaint on September 4, 2025, against Defendants Michael Castillo and Cliff Dean Schneider. (Doc. 1). That same day, Plaintiffs filed a motion for temporary restraining order (“TRO”). (Docs. 3, 4). On September 10, 2025, Plaintiffs filed a motion for preliminary injunction. (Doc. 12). On September 11, 2025, Plaintiffs filed a motion for partial summary judgment. (Doc. 17). The Court issued its order screening Plaintiffs’ complaint on September 22, 2025, finding Plaintiffs failed to plead any cognizable claims and granting leave to amend.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.