Espinoza

Mike Morgan v. A. Espinoza, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20252:23-cv-01955California663 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIKE MORGAN, No. 2:23-CV-1955-DAD-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER A. ESPINOZA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 15, 2024, the Court ordered service of Plaintiff’s first amended complaint on Defendants Davies, Hall, and Espinoza. See ECF No. 17. On October 15, 2024, Defendant Davies filed an answer, see ECF No. 32, and Defendants Espinoza and Hall filed a motion to dismiss, see ECF No. 31. The Court recommended that the motion to dismiss be granted in part and denied in part, that Defendant Hall be dismissed, and that Defendant Espinoza be directed to file an answer to the first amended complaint. See ECF No. 41. The District Judge adopted the findings and recommendations in full on August 18, 2025. See ECF No. 47. Defendant Espinoza filed an answer to the first amended complaint on September 11,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.