Macomber

William Lyle Nible v. Jeff Macomber, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20252:24-cv-01259California746 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM LYLE NIBLE, Case No. 2:24-cv-01259-DJC-CSK Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

JEFF MACOMBER, et al., PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Defendants. (ECF No. 93) 16 On September 8, 2025, this action was dismissed with prejudice and judgment entered. (ECF Nos. 90, 91). On September 11, 2025, Plaintiff William Lyle Nible filed a Notice of Appeal and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF Nos. 92, 93). Plaintiff’s Notice of Appeal was processed to the United States Court of Appeals of the Ninth Circuit as Case No. 25-5800. (ECF No. 96). On September 12, 2025, the district judge referred this matter to the undersigned for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should be granted for the appeal. See 9/12/2025 Order (ECF No. 95). For the reasons that follow, the Court recommends Plaintiff’s IFP motion be DENIED. An appeal may not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.