Ramirez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DeEARL FOSTER, No. 2:24-cv-2800 WBS AC P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS RAMIREZ, et al., Respondents. 16 By order filed May 22, 2025, the court screened petitioner’s application for writ of habeas corpus and found that it did not state any grounds for relief, and ordered that it not be served. ECF No. 11. Petitioner was given thirty days to file an amended petition and cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. at 2. After petitioner failed to file an amended habeas corpus petition, he was given an additional three weeks, until July 18, 2025, to file an amended petition and warned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without further warning. ECF No. 15. The deadline has long since passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended petition or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly,…