Jones

Felipe Polanco Diaz v. Gena Jones, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20252:24-cv-03339California374 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FELIPE POLANCO. DIAZ, No. 2:24-cv-3339 DC CSK P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS GENA JONES, et al., Defendants. 16 By order filed April 22, 2025, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed, and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint, and on June 12, 2025, the Court recommended that the action be dismissed. (ECF No. 10.) On July 7, 2025, plaintiff filed a motion for extension of time to amend. (ECF No. 11.) On July 11, 2025, the prior findings and recommendations were vacated, and plaintiff was granted sixty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 12.) Sixty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the Court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.