Cooper

Aaron Anthony Walker v. Sheriff James (Jim) Cooper

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20252:25-cv-01524California3,572 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AARON ANTHONY WALKER, No. 2:25-cv-1524 DJC CSK P Plaintiff, ORDER v. SHERIFF JAMES (JIM) COOPER, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding pro se. Defendant timely removed this action from state court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441 and 1446. Plaintiff did not object to removal. By this action, plaintiff challenges various conditions of his confinement at the Sacramento County Main Jail. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). As discussed below, plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. I. SCREENING STANDARDS The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.