(PC)Valencia

Christopher G. Valencia v. Medina, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20251:22-cv-00569California1,697 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER G. VALENCIA, No. 1:22-cv-00569 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER CONSTRUING PLAINTIFF’S “OBJECTIONS” AS MOTION FOR v. RECONSIDERATION MEDINA, et al., (See ECF No. 22) Defendants. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has paid the filing fee. The matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 Before this Court, is Plaintiff’s “objections” to the Court’s screening order. ECF No. 22. 21 The Court herein construes the filing as a motion for reconsideration, and it will direct the Clerk 22 of Court to describe it as such on the Court’s docket. For the reasons stated below, the motion 23 will be denied, and under separate order, it will be recommended that Claim Three be dismissed 24 for failure to state a claim…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.