Sunkara

Stanley H. Solvey v. Savitha Sunkara, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20251:23-cv-00682California5,861 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STANLEY H. SOLVEY, Case No.: 1:23-cv-00682-KES-CDB Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS AND

v. DEFENDANTS FOLLOWING SCREENING

SAVITHA SUNKARA, et al., 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Stanley H. Solvey is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. I. INTRODUCTION The Court issued its First Screening Order on August 2, 2023. (Doc. 11.) It determined Plaintiff’s original complaint stated a cognizable Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claim against Defendant Sunkara but failed to state a claim against any other named defendant. (Id. at 11.) Plaintiff was directed to file a first amended complaint, or a notice indicating he wished to proceed only on his cognizable claim, or a notice of voluntary dismissal. (Id. at 11-12.) On October 3, 2023, following an extension of time, Plaintiff filed a first…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.