Bick

David W. Faunce v. Joseph Bick, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20251:25-cv-00006California6,678 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID W. FAUNCE, Case No. 1:25-cv-00006-KES-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, v. RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE

DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

JOSEPH BICK, et al., CLAIM

Defendants. (ECF No. 1, 9, 17)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

THIRTY (30) DAYS

17 David W. Faunce (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this action. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on January 3, 19 2025. (ECF No. 1). 20 On April 4, 2025, the Court issued a screening order, finding that Plaintiff’s complaint 21 failed to state any cognizable claims. (ECF No. 9). The Court provided Plaintiff with 22 applicable legal standards, explained why Plaintiff’s complaint failed to state a claim, and gave 23 Plaintiff leave to file a First Amended Complaint. (Id.). The Court also gave Plaintiff the 24 option of standing on his complaint, subject to the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.