Brooke

Theresa Brooke v. Castle Investments LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20251:25-cv-01194California2,990 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THERESA BROOKE, Case No. 1:25-cv-01194-KES-CDB Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DECLINE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION

v. OVER PLAINTIFF’S STATE LAW CLAIMS CASTLE INVESTMENTS LLC, (Docs. 1, 5) Defendant. 14-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Background On September 14, 2025, Plaintiff Theresa Brooke (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action with the filing of a complaint against Defendant Castle Investments LLC (“Defendant”), alleging violations of the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act. (Doc. 1). These claims stem from alleged barriers Plaintiff encountered while visiting a facility owned, operated, or leased by Defendant. Id. at 2-3. Defendant has not appeared. On September 16, 2025, the undersigned ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over her Unruh Act claim in light of the Ninth Circuit’s decision…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.