Hales
Tri Tool, Inc. v. Thad Hales, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRI TOOL, INC., Case No. 2:22-cv-01515-DAD-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S EX
THAD HALES, et al., PARTE MOTION TO CONTINUE
DISCOVERY DEADLINES
Defendants. (ECF No. 104)
17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Tri Tool, Inc.’s ex parte motion to continue fact and expert discovery, which was filed on September 12, 2025.1 (ECF No. 104.) Defendant Enerpac filed an opposition on September 14, 2025 (ECF No. 105) and Plaintiff filed a reply on September 15, 2025 (ECF No. 106). Given the timing of the submission of Plaintiff’s motion, its filing as an ex parte request, and the September 29, 2025 fact discovery deadline, the Court scheduled an informal discovery teleconference by phone on September 22, 2025. Graham Gordon Lambert appeared as counsel for Plaintiff; Jonathan Schmidt and Sheereen Javadizadeh appeared as counsel for Defendant Enerpac. (ECF No. 112.) Individual…