Aliwalas

William Cresham v. Kristal Aliwalas, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20252:24-cv-03438California911 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM CRESHAM, Case No. 2:24-cv-3438-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER KRISTAL ALIWALAS, et al., Defendants. 16 17 William Cresham, a state prisoner, brings this action against five defendants, all medical providers, and alleges numerous violations of his Eighth Amendment right to adequate medical care. The claims raised, however, are not sufficiently related to proceed together. I will dismiss the operative complaint, ECF Nos. 16 & 16-1, with leave to amend so that plaintiff may bring only related claims. I. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen a prisoner’s complaint that seeks relief against a governmental entity, officer, or employee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the complaint that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.