Lopez

Dimitri Z. Storm v. Lopez, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20252:25-cv-02014California1,216 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DIMITRI Z. STORM, Case No. 2:25-cv-2014-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER LOPEZ, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff brings this action against three CDCR officers and the Warden of Mule Creek State Prison. The allegations fail to state a claim. Plaintiff may, if he chooses, file an amended complaint that addresses the deficiencies noted herein. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis makes the required showing and will be granted. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the complaint that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. Id. 28 A complaint must contain a short…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.