Jackie Stapleton v. United Healthcare Benefits Plan of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20251:25-cv-00351California1,122 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JACKIE STAPLETON, Case No. 1:25-cv-00351-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION

v. (ECF Nos. 28, 29) UNITED HEALTHCARE BENEFITS PLAN

OF CALIFORNIA, OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS Defendant. 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action and has received permission to file electronically pursuant to Local Rule 133(b)(3). (ECF Nos. 1, 15.) On August 21, 2025, the assigned District Judge adopted in full this Court’s findings and recommendations recommending granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss and denying Plaintiff’s motion for remand. (ECF No. 29.) In its order, the District Judge gave Plaintiff leave to amend but admonished Plaintiff that she is “advised that failure to file an amended complaint will result in dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute and failure to obey the Court’s order.” (Id. at p. 3.) (emphasis in original). The deadline for Plaintiff to file her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.