Paragon Six v. Girgis CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 3, 2025B327441California4,563 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/31/25 Paragon Six v. Girgis CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

PARAGON SIX, LLC, et al., B327441 B337407

Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 21LBCV00258) v.

RYAN GIRGIS,

Defendant and Appellant.

B331507

PARAGON SIX, LLC, et al.,

Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 21LBCV00258) v.

NADER BASTA,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEALS from the judgment and orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michael P. Vicencia, Judge. Vacated with directions as to the judgment. Dismissed as to the orders. Gusdorff Law, Janet Gusdorff; The Law Office of Greg May, Greg May; The Law Office of Stanley Stern and Stanley…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.