Stolfi

Oregon Right to Life v. Stolfi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 31, 202524-6650California10,388 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OREGON RIGHT TO LIFE, No. 24-6650 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 6:23-cv-01282- MK v. ANDREW R. STOLFI, in his official capacities as Department of OPINION Consumer and Business Services Director and Oregon Insurance Commissioner, Defendant - Appellee, and OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER & BUSINESS SERVICES, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Ann L. Aiken, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted June 17, 2025 2 OREGON RIGHT TO LIFE V. STOLFI San Francisco, California Filed October 31, 2025 Before: Mary M. Schroeder, John B. Owens, and Lawrence VanDyke, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge VanDyke; Concurrence by Judge VanDyke; Dissent by Judge Schroeder SUMMARY * Free Exercise of Religion/Abortion In an action brought by Oregon Right to Life (ORTL), an education and advocacy organization that seeks relief under the First and Fourteenth Amendments from Oregon’s Reproductive Health Equity Act’s requirement that it provide abortion and contraceptive insurance coverage to its employees, the panel reversed the district court’s order dismissing ORTL’s complaint for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.