People v. Holston CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 3, 2025C102062California1,483 words

Opinion

Opinion

Eurie, J.

BACKGROUND

On April 3, 2024, Officer Robert Frank saw Holston, whom he recognized, walking on Placerville Drive. A records check confirmed Holston had not registered monthly as required of a transient sex offender registrant. Officer Frank placed Holston under arrest, and during the search incident to arrest that followed, found a baggie of methamphetamine and glass pipes in Holston’s pockets. Following a preliminary hearing, the People filed an information charging Holston with possession of a controlled substance with a specified prior conviction (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a); count 1); failure to register as a sex offender (Pen. Code, § 290.011, subd. (a); count 2),1 and possession of drug paraphernalia (Health & Saf. Code, § 11364, subd. (a); count 3). The information further alleged several factors in aggravation. On July 12, 2024, Holston resolved the case by pleading no contest to counts 1 and 2 and admitting the aggravating factor that he had performed unsatisfactorily on probation. In exchange, Holston would receive two years of formal probation with a suspended sentence. Whether Holston would be subject to electronic monitoring does not appear on the plea…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.