GXM

GXM, et al. v. PAMELA CONNIE, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20253:24-cv-00677California1,355 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GXM, et al., Case No. 24-cv-00677-AMO

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

PAMELA CONNIE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 89 Defendants.

12 Plaintiffs Jessica Renee Hissner Mendoza, Victor Mendoza, and their child, GXM, sue the City and County of San Francisco (“CCSF”), two of its social workers, Ifeyinwa Nzerem and Mary Payette, Pamela Connie, a lead supervisor at CCSF’s Human Services Agency, and Jonathon Blackman, an executive director at Harbor Lights Family Shelter, based on their alleged roles in the removal of GXM from his parents’ custody. Amended Complaint (“Am. Compl.”) (Dkt. No. 82). CCSF moves to dismiss the operative complaint, or alternatively, for a more definite statement. Motion to Dismiss (“Mot.”) (Dkt. No. 89); Reply to Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (“Reply”) (Dkt. No. 92). Plaintiffs oppose. Opposition to Motion for Dismiss (“Opp.”) (Dkt. No. 91). The motion is fully briefed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.