Litwin

Jan Litwin v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20252:23-cv-01885California3,444 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAN LITWIN, No. 2:23-cv-01885-DC-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES

INSURANCE COMPANY,

15 Defendant. (Doc. Nos. 26, 28, 41)

17 This matter is before the court on Defendant Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company’s motion to dismiss due to Plaintiff’s failure to comply with a court order and failure to prosecute, motion to modify the scheduling, and request for a case management conference and a scheduling order.1 (Doc. Nos. 26, 28, 41.) The pending motions were taken under submission to be decided on the papers pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (Doc. No. 35.) For the reasons discussed below, the court will deny Defendant’s motion to dismiss, grant its motion to modify the case schedule, and grant its request for a modified scheduling order. /////

1 Defendant captions his scheduling motion as a motion to continue trial and set status conference. (Doc. No. 28.) However, a trial date is presently not set…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.