Mayorkas

Sarah Imad Maadarani v. Kristi Noem, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20252:24-cv-01325California1,324 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SARAH IMAD MAADARANI, No. 2:24-cv-01325-DC-SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

KRISTI NOEM, et al.,1 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Sarah Imad Maadarani is proceeding pro se in this action, which is referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Defendants filed a motion to dismiss (ECF No. 23), arguing that this action is now moot because a consular officer acted on Plaintiff’s spouse’s application for a visa and refused that application. ECF No. 23 at 2. Defendants request the Court recommend dismissal of the action as moot and vacate its prior Findings and Recommendations (“F&R”) (ECF No. 18). For the reasons stated below, the Court hereby VACATES its F&R and will recommend that Defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted and the action be dismissed as moot. //// 27 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d), when a public officer ceases to hold office while the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.