Roberta M. Lilly v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20252:24-cv-01504California7,953 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERTA M. LILLY, No. 2:24-cv-1504 AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), denying her application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act (“the Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-34. For the reasons that follow, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment will be GRANTED, and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment DENIED. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff applied for DIB on January 11, 2016, alleging disability beginning August 26, 2015. AR 29. The application was disapproved initially on May 3, 2016, and after 26 DIB is paid to disabled persons who have contributed to the Disability Insurance Program, and who suffer from a mental or physical disability. 42 U.S.C. § 423(a)(1); Bowen v. City of New York, 476 U.S. 467, 470…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.