Trimpey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY LEE WILLIAMS, No. 2:24-cv-02148 SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER and TRIMPEY, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is incarcerated in a county jail and proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 21, 2025, the undersigned screened plaintiff’s complaint and found it failed to state any cognizable claims for relief. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff was granted thirty (30) days to file an amended complaint. (Id. at 8.) Plaintiff was further advised that failure to file an amended complaint would result in the recommendation that the action be dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Id.) The time for plaintiff to amend his complaint has now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the screening order. Accordingly, the undersigned recommends that the action be…