Jaden Andrew Reinis v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20252:24-cv-02278California5,250 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JADEN ANDREW REINIS, No. 2:24-cv-2278-SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), denying his application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (“the Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381-1383f. For the reasons that follow, Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment will be DENIED, and the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment will be GRANTED. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff applied for SSI on August 6, 2021, alleging a disability onset date of July 1,

SSI is paid to financially needy disabled persons. 42 U.S.C. § 1382(a); Washington State Dept. of Social and Health Services v. Guardianship Estate of Keffeler, 537 U.S. 371, 375 (2003) (“Title XVI of the Act, § 1381 et seq., is the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) scheme…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.