Rodriguez

Rebeka Rodriguez v. Culligan International Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20253:25-cv-00225California2,946 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 REBEKA RODRIGUEZ, Case No.: 25-cv-00225-AJB-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT

CULLIGAN INTERNATIONAL

COMPANY,

15 (Doc. No. 16) Defendant.

17 Before the Court is Defendant Culligan International Company’s (“Culligan”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff Rebeka Rodriguez’s (“Rodriguez”) First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). (Doc. No. 16.) The motion is fully briefed. (Doc. Nos. 16; 18; 20.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Culligan’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Rodriguez is “a consumer privacy advocate who works as a ‘tester’ to ensure that companies abide by the privacy obligations imposed by California law.” (Doc. No. 10 ¶ 6.) On an unspecified date in August 2024, Rodriguez visited Culligan’s …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.