Brunell

Heidi Brunell v. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.; Adrian Moores; and Does 1 through 10, inclusive

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20253:25-cv-01125California1,785 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 HEIDI BRUNELL, an individual, Case No.: 25-CV-1125 JLS (DEB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND

COMPLAINT

THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.;

ADRIAN MOORES, an individual; and (ECF No. 23) DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,

15 Defendants. 16 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Heidi Brunell’s Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (“Mot.” ECF No. 23). Also before the Court is Defendants Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.’s and Adrian Moores’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 29) and Plaintiff’s Reply to Opposition to Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (“Reply,” ECF No. 35). Plaintiff seeks to amend the Complaint (“Compl.,” ECF No. 1) in light of evidence disclosed by Defendants after the deadlines for initial disclosures and amending pleadings. Mot. at 2. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion (ECF No. 23). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.