Prakash

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Vidul Prakash

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20255:23-cv-03300California11,663 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case No. 23-cv-03300-BLF

COMMISSION,

8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY v. JUDGMENT AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL

VIDUL PRAKASH, SUMMARY JUDGMENT

11 Defendant. [Re: ECF Nos. 199, 201]

13 Before the Court are Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC’s”) Motion 14 for Partial Summary Judgment, ECF No. 199 (“Pl. Mot.”), and Defendant Vidul Prakash’s Motion 15 for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 201 (“Def. Mot.”). Plaintiff filed an Opposition to Defendant’s 16 Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 204 (“Pl. Opp.”), and Reply in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, ECF No. 207 (“Pl. Reply”). Defendant filed an Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, ECF No. 203 (“Def. Opp.”), and Reply in Support of Defendant’s Motion for Summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.