Willard Marine, Inc., a California Corporation, and Gem Ventures Ltd., a Delaware Limited Liability Company v. Shanghai Breeze Technology Company, Ltd., a Chinese Limited Liability Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20253:25-cv-02907California2,053 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLARD MARINE, INC., a California Case No.: 25-CV-2907 JLS (BLM) Corporation, and GEM VENTURES 12 LTD., a Delaware Limited Liability ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 13 Company., DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’

EX PARTE MOTION FOR

14 Plaintiffs,

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

15 v. ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW

CAUSE RE PRELIMINARY

16 SHANGHAI BREEZE TECHNOLOGY

INJUNCTION

COMPANY, LTD., a Chinese Limited 17 Liability Company, (ECF No. 3) 18 Defendant. 19 20 Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs Willard Marine, Inc.’s and GEM Ventures, 21 LTD.’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) Enjoining Defendant Shanghai 22 Breeze Technology Company, LTD’s (“Shanghai Breeze”) Enforcement of Arbitral Award 23 (“TRO Mot.,” ECF No. 3). Plaintiffs filed their TRO Motion without proof of service. See 24 generally Docket. Plaintiffs accompanied their TRO with a supporting Memorandum of 25 Points and Authorities (ECF No. 3-1), a Declaration from Plaintiffs’ counsel,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.